To the Editor:
We read the article “The Efficacy of Intra-Articular Versus Extra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections in the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint” by Katt et al
1
with great interest, as optimal placement of steroid injections in the thumb carpometacarpal joint is intensely discussed among hand surgeons. Our own clinical experience shows that there is no evident difference in pain reduction between extra- and intra-articular injections. Although we were pleased to see a scientific investigation addressing this topic, we were nonetheless surprised by the study conclusion that intra-articular injections provide significantly lower pain and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores compared with extra-articular injections at 3 months (P < .05). We believe some scientific shortcomings markedly influenced the results. Patients were allocated to intra- and extra-articular groups post hoc: that is, according to the final location of steroid deposition. Accompanying interventions, including pain medication and orthotic or hand therapy, were also not standardized. Yet, these interventions seem to be effective and could, therefore, influence the outcome of steroid injection therapy.2
Another concern is the interpretation of differences in DASH and visual analog scale pain scores at 3 months. Although statistical testing revealed significant P values, the group differences in DASH and pain scores were smaller than the minimal important difference (MID); the MID ranges between 10 and 19 points for the DASH and between 1.3 and 2.1 points, on a numeric rating scale, for pain at rest.3
, 4
, 5
Therefore, the clinical relevance of the group differences is questionable and the significant P values could, in fact, be because of chance or other, unscreened factors.Overall, we question the generalizability of the newly published results and propose further examination, in a randomized controlled trial, of the highly interesting question of whether intra- or extra-articular steroid injections are more effective in treating thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. In such a study, administration of injections should be done under fluoroscopic control, additional therapies should be standardized, and a statistician should be involved for high-quality data analysis.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Melissa Wilhelmi for manuscript editing.
References
- The efficacy of intra-articular versus extra-articular corticosteroid injections in the thumb carpometacarpal joint.J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022; 4: 128-134
- Effectiveness of physical and occupational therapy on pain, function and quality of life in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis –a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hand Ther. 2016; 21: 5-15
- Minimal important difference after hand surgery: a prospective assessment for DASH, MHQ, and SF-12.SICOT J. 2016; 2: 32
- Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.J Hand Surg Am. 2013; 38: 641-649
- Clinical thresholds of symptoms for deciding on surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019; 44: 937-945
Article info
Publication history
Published online: August 17, 2022
Footnotes
Declaration of interests: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Society for Surgery of the Hand.
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy

Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy